With this
being a contemporary style of dance, the approach was different. Placing an
emphasis on the devising process and organic creation of ideas and dance
motifs. The audience was implicitly asked to read into the visual and auditory elements
of the performance to interpret any narratives, symbolism, and meaning. What is
consistent though is that the choreography is tribal-inspired. The world of the
performance is dystopian, perilous, and rapidly declining. Occasionally,
there is a glimmer of light, joy, and innocence. “Grand Finale” is comprised of
a multitude of component parts, production elements, and fragmented motifs. Tied
together by this aesthetically-pleasing world brought to life by the
performers, set, lighting, sound, and live music.
The
ensemble of dancers were committed, focused, and demonstrated athleticism. I
could see influences from other physical theatre style companies such as
Frantic Assembly. The language of the movement was certainly varied; it was circular
and angular, quick and slow, big and small. Featuring falls and lifts, isolated
and unison movement, use of hands and arms, push and pull, up and down action patterns.
Swimming through various styles, the choreography screamed war and conflict when the soldier saluted, the stress and strains of life, as well as
highlighting the dichotomy between life and death. The partner sequences
involving one partner manipulating the limp and corpse-like body of another
dancer was haunting and memorable. It was wonderfully universal because there
was no speech. Just action. Referencing the “part-gig” aspect of the
performance, sometimes the choreographic style could be likened to elegantly organised
chaos. It was physically demanding choreography but the ensemble rose to the
challenge.
As I wrote
earlier, Tom Scutt’s design was beautiful and distinctive to the company. The
costumes included shirts and trousers of various colours like white, beige, and
brown – complimenting this bleak and brooding world. The towering blocks formed
intimidating shadows and elicited feelings of claustrophobia. On the whole, the
lighting by Tom Visser featured the colours of white and blue, sometimes warmer
colours. Spotlights lit the performers and set from behind and top-down
generating tension and conflict. You got a sense the stage lights were slowly
pulsating. The music was neither the star of the show nor underscoring the
action. It effectively played its part in manipulating the emotions of the
audience at the right moments. Stylistically, it was more about the chords and
harmonic progression when compared to the melody, nevertheless it fostered a rousing
atmosphere.
In summary:
“Grand Finale” was filled with beautiful imagery, nuanced choreography, and
fragmented ideas. I wouldn’t say it was a “grand” finale, but a finale
production that was done very well.
No comments:
Post a Comment